Loading…
Product Design
Arabic users notice a mirrored-afterthought interface instantly. Building RTL from day one changes how you write CSS, name components, and even design motion.
Many products treat Arabic support as a final step: take the English layout, flip it, translate the strings. The result is usable — and visibly second-class. Arabic typography has its own rhythm, its own density, and its own expectations for how a page breathes.
The single highest-leverage habit is writing CSS with logical properties — start and end instead of left and right, margin-inline instead of margin-left. Once direction lives in the stylesheet rather than in coordinates, most of the layout adapts automatically, and the remaining exceptions become deliberate design decisions.
Arabic typefaces are not Latin fonts with different glyphs. Letter-spacing breaks connected scripts; tight line-heights crush diacritics; buttons sized for Latin labels overflow with Arabic ones. We set separate typographic scales per language and test real Arabic copy, never lorem ipsum.
Carousels, page transitions, and progress indicators all imply direction. An interface that slides one way in English and the same way in Arabic feels subtly wrong at best. Direction-aware animation is a small investment that users feel rather than notice.
The strongest signal a product can send is that Arabic is not the exception. When the design system is built RTL-first — and English becomes the alternate view — both languages end up better engineered.
Our engineers write from practice — the same thinking shapes the software we deliver.